-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- July 2020
- April 2020
- April 2019
- March 2019
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- October 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- July 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
Categories
Meta
Monthly Archives: July 2012
Ma-Re-Ga. Marx Rabindranath Gandhi
Ma-Re-Ga. Marx Rabindranath Gandhi
2011. Unpublished manuscript on “Marx-Rabindranath-Gandhi ” [Ma-Re-Ga] along with a review of the collection “Debating Gandhi” (Oxford, 2006), edited by A. Raghuramaraju. Cover: Debraj Goswami
Qualitative analysis vs. (?) Quantitative Analysis, In Search of Methods
Quantitative vs. (?) Qualitative Analysis in Psychology
2010. Teaching Materials. Orientation Course on Qualitative Analysis. Dept. of Psychology, Calcutta University& CISSR
Scholars Differ : D.B. & T.M.M. On Probal Dasgupta & L. Khubchandani
Scholars Differ : D.B. & T.M.M. On Probal Dasgupta & L. Khubchandani
1997. Scholars Differ : D.B. & T.M.M. On Probal Dasgupta & L. Khuchandani. DLA News. 21:11 November ’97 (pg.3) RN KL/Tv(n)/116 ( A Discussion On the Review of Khubchandani’s 1997. Revisualizing Boundaries; Introduction: Probal Dasgupta)
Posted in Academic Papers & Books
Leave a comment
নিরানন্দলোক
১৯৯০-৯৪. নিরানন্দলোক. সম্পা. দেবপ্রসাদ বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়. সহযোগিতা:প্রয়াত ননী ভৌমিক, অঞ্জন ঘোষ, সুব্রত শংকর বাগচী. নামাঙ্কন: প্রয়াত সাধনপ্রসাদ বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়. ছায়াবাজির ছবি: সুকুমার রায়.
Electronic Capitalism
Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay
Indian Statistical Institute
January 17, 1999
Frontier, Vol. 31, No. 25, pp. 4-6, 1999
Abstract:
This paper Highlights on ‘Cyberspace’, an Electronic space simulated for communication network founded by post Industrialized Society, where the assembly line of mass production is not followed; producing standardized commodities following Fordian line has almost vanished and it is supplemented by non-standardized non-prototypical craft production; and in the realm of division labor, Taylorian paradigm is substituted by workshop-based flexible alternating division of labor. This deployment of high-tech in the simple commodity production is based on the linguistic corpus collected from the heterogeneous so-called locals and those local choices are stored in the computerized data-repertoire. Local choices are considered for the sake of creating niche market. Thus, the phenomenon of globalization (Global Local) that is operating within the cyberspace has emerged. This is also reflected in the languages of electronic ads. What author has referred to as Electronic Capitalism, subscribing the Print Capitalism a la Benedict Anderson, was elaborated in reference to the phenomenon “globalization”. What is this hyper-domain of cyberspace of communication? In the so-called global village, an exclusive interactive zone is created with the help of cybernetic science. This new communication space has emerged due to the introduction of electronic capitalism supplementing the print capitalism. Due to the proliferation as well as explosion of electronic industry, this new space enjoys a dominant position to enhance the quickest communication. Ideal speaker-hearer, though they are in physical Diaspora, communicate in the cyberspace and they are exchanging their languages as apparent reciprocal donor-receptors, and therefore, code mixing (cohabitation or encroachment?) is an usual phenomena in this cyberspace. Baudrillard (1975) aptly called this age as an ‘age of simulation”, third order of pretension, where he found signs as representation of themselves. In this third order, the sign of creative computer, without any signifier, endowed with human faculty, does not refer to anything outside itself, viz. creative speaking subject — a presence whose absence they mark — but rather serve to mask the absence of any exterior — the relation between the real and representation or “representational” imaginary is dissolved and hyper-realty of cyber-space begins, where any the self — referential signs emerges as real ‘reality’ by veiling the “real” self. Thus, intelligent computer or talking machines are “real” talking beings in this third order instead of speaking subjects. In this simulated cyberspace, non-signifying electronic devices endowed with human faculty re-inscribe a regime of phonocentrism Deluze and Guattari (1977) or some thing more than phonic, it may be termed as electrocentrism to cover all the possible manifestations of electronic media). Deluze and Guattari (1977) argued that the language and its subsequent semiotic process within the ambit of capitalism are not related to encoded signifying processes but it is concerned with decoded flows, i.e. the material flows of electric language, which is a simulacrum of something without semantic content. It is the capacity of modern language technology to acquire the power of fetish of “other” without being a participant in the other’s domain. Computer, an impersonal machine, now talks with the “other” by deploying, nor logocentric, neither phonocentric, but electrocentnic techno-discourse. This techno-discourse, in the realm of technical intelligentsia’s culture of critical discourse, has become algocentric meta discourse, i.e., a discourse, which is guided by the formal, computable, and algorithmic principles of meta mathematics.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5
Keywords: algocentric discourse, electronic capitalism, electrocentrism, phonocentrism, cyberspace
Horidasi and other Grannies
2010. Horidasi and other Grannies “HoridaSi o Oneke.” Dutta, Swapna ed. Thakuma-didimara. Kolkata: Unajon. (pp.140-65) Cover: Sabuj Mukhopadhyay
Gender Studies
কামনা, শৃঙ্গার, নচিকেত অভিযাত্রা –কৈশোরেই Adolescence and Sexuality
কামনা, শৃঙ্গার, নচিকেত অভিযাত্রা –কৈশোরেই Adolescence and Sexuality The author of this paper, as a member of the committee, constituted by the then Government of West Bengal with the help WHO, on Life Style Education for teens (secondary level) in … Continue reading